Bibliographic record
Abstract
EFT therapists help clients to integrate and consolidate their changes in Stage 3, and this chapter and the following two chapters help the reader to integrate and consolidate what it means to be an EFT process consultant dancing the EFT Tango in attunement with clients. Using the metaphor of Inuit human-shaped stone sculptural markers, called inukshuks or inuksuit, that guide travelers across the vast arctic landscape, this chapter reviews signposts or micro-markers of clients’ cultural and emotional experience, to help therapists detect and follow subtle signals of emotion and culture across the EFT terrain and to increase the emerging depths of emotional experiencing. The chapter ends with a brief discussion of an EFT therapist’s felt-sense understanding. Felt-sensing – feeling another’s experience in one’s own body as much as possible – is the link between scientific knowledge and creative competency. In EFT, emotional experiencing and racial-ethnic-cultural (REC) experience coalesce with therapist intuitive felt-sensing and therapeutic artistry. The supplementary materials online resources include expanded details on how therapist’s deliberate felt-sensing can enhance therapy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".