MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402408621 · doi:10.3390/hydrology11090144

Development of Statistical Downscaling Model Based on Volterra Series Realization, Principal Components, Climate Classification, and Ridge Regression

2024· article· en· W4402408621 on OpenAlexfundaboutno aff
Pooja Singh, Asaad Y. Shamseldin, Bruce W. Melville, Liam Wotherspoon

Bibliographic record

VenueHydrology · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicCryospheric studies and observations
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
KeywordsDownscalingRidgeRealization (probability)Principal component analysisSeries (stratigraphy)ClimatologyRegressionRegression analysisPrincipal component regressionStatistical analysisEnvironmental scienceStatisticsGeologyClimate changeMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper applied the fuzzy function approach, combined with the ridge regression model, to produce daily rainfall projections from large-scale climate variables. This study developed a statistical downscaling model based on principal components, c-means fuzzy clustering, Volterra series, and ridge regression. The model is known, hereafter as SDC2R2. In the developed downscaling model, the use of ridge regression, instead of multiple linear regression, is proposed to downscale daily rainfall with wide range (WR) predictors. The WR predictors were applied to sufficiently incorporate climate change signals. The developed model also captured the non-linear interactions of the climate variables by applying the transformation of Volterra series realization over WR predictors. This transformation was performed by applying principal components as orthogonal filters. Further, these principal components were clustered by using c-means clustering and non-linear transformations were applied on these membership functions, to improve the prediction ability of the model. The reanalysis of climate data from the National Centres for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) was used to develop the model and was validated by using the Global Climate Model (GCM) for four locations in the Manawatu River basin. The developed model was used to obtain future daily rainfall projections from three Representative Concentrative Pathways (RCP 2.6, RCP 4.5, and RCP 8.5) scenarios from the Canadian Earth System Model (CanESM2) GCM. The performance of the model was compared with a widely used statistical downscaling model (SDSM). It was observed that the model performed better than SDSM in downscaling rainfall on a daily basis. Every scenario indicated that there is a probability of obtaining high future rainfall frequency. The results of this study provide valuable information for decision-makers since climate change may potentially impact the Manawatu basin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.387
Threshold uncertainty score0.263

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHydrologySame topicCryospheric studies and observationsFrench-language works237,207