MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402416914 · doi:10.53555/sfs.v10i1.2738

Isolation of Cyanobacteria from water sample and study of its efficiency to degrade Organophosphorus Pesticide Malathion.

2023· article· en· W4402416914 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jaya Philip, Jahanvi Rani, Pragya Rani

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Survey in Fisheries Sciences · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMalathionCyanobacteriaPesticideEnvironmental scienceIsolation (microbiology)Environmental chemistryToxicologyBiologyChemistryEcologyMicrobiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This research focuses on the phycoremediation potential of cyanobacteria in degrading the organophosphorous pesticide malathion. Cyanobacterial strains isolated from water samples obtained from paddy field were cultivated using BG11 and Pringsheim’s media. The study has three main objectives. Firstly, it investigates the impact of malathion on the growth of selected cyanobacterial strains, analyzing growth patterns over an 8-10 week period. Secondly, it examines the ability of cyanobacteria to utilize malathion as a phosphorous source, offering insights into their potential role in phosphorous pollution mitigation. Lastly, the research quantifies changes in phosphorous and pesticide residue levels within the culture media, providing a comprehensive understanding of nutrient dynamics during the incubation period. This research contributes to the field of phycoremediation by elucidating the interactions between cyanobacteria and malathion. The findings hold relevance for environmental scientist and ecologists involved in the sustainable management of pesticide-contaminated aquatic ecosystems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Survey in Fisheries SciencesSame topicAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton DynamicsFrench-language works237,207