Minimizing Defects in Additive Manufacturing and Laser Welding Through Energy Coupling Experiments and Dynamic Modelling
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Additive manufacturing is a revolutionary technology that produces complex components as a single piece, replacing traditional assemblies and reducing waste. Laser powder bed fusion, a type of additive manufacturing, allows for limitless design freedom by building intricate parts layer-by-layer through melting and fusing metal powder. However, build quality remains inconsistent, with deformations like pores and spattering occurring. To improve modelling of the behaviour of melted metal, thus minimizing defects, an experiment which determined the metal’s absorptance of laser energy through integrating sphere radiometry was conducted. The integrating sphere, which spatially integrated a fraction of measured light to calculate full radiance, had to sit above the build plate and not interfere with powder spreading. I designed two parts which attached the integrating sphere to the motorized powder spreading blade. Utilizing small ridges in the enclosure as weight-bearing tracks, the blade’s torque was reduced while allowing precise movement of the sphere. Through implementing these parts, the experiment was conducted, whose results will aid in our understanding of laser-metal interactions. Defects like spattering also occur during laser welding, due to the vaporization of unstable liquid metal. To combat this, novel beam shapes have been seen to increase the stability of the keyhole. To model this effect, I created a phenomenological, dynamic model of the keyhole depth during a copper weld. Two differential equations were created to model the keyhole depth’s rate of change using a dual mode and single mode laser, depending on absorptance and incident laser intensity. The dynamic depth of the keyhole for both modes was numerical solved in Python and iterated using existing copper weld data. Through better quantitative understanding of energy coupling and numerical modelling of the resulting dynamics, defects in laser welding and additive manufacturing can be minimized.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".