Reinforcement Learning for Jointly Optimal Coding and Control Policies for a Markovian System Controlled over a Communication Channel
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper develops approximation and optimality results for the optimal control of a networked system. In this system, a Markovian process is managed over a finite-rate, noiseless communication channel. Solving this problem involves determining joint optimal coding and control policies that minimize cost over time. While theoretical results on optimal coding and control structures exist, practical implementation has remained largely infeasible for non-linear systems due to the computational complexities and uncountable state spaces. This research introduces an approach that combines structural results with reinforcement learning (RL) techniques. The method uses regularity properties of the system to approximate the uncountable state space with a countable one, which allows reinforcement learning algorithms to achieve near-optimal solutions. Specifically, we establish that finite model approximations (where infinite state spaces are quantized to finite ones) and sliding finite window approximations (where a finite memory "window" of past control actions is maintained at each time step) can be employed to develop near-optimality. These approximations allow the system to be reformulated as a Markov Decision Problem (MDP) with a finite state space, making RL algorithms implementable. The convergence of the reinforcement learning algorithm to a near-optimal policy (under both the previous approximations) is supported by theoretical analysis and performance simulations. We ensure that the solutions obtained are not only computationally feasible but also nearly optimal with respect to the original problem. The applications of this work extend to many networked control systems, especially those with zero-delay coding and partially observable Markov decision processes (POMDPs). By integrating structural results with learning algorithms, this paper provides a practical framework for implementing optimal control in finite-rate environments.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".