Support Vector Machine for Sentiment Analysis of PT. Paragon Technology and Innovation (Case Study of Brand Make Over and Emina Product Users on Female Daily Page – Beauty Review)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Support Vector Machine (SVM) is one of the classification models in Supervised Learning that is commonly used to classify user sentiment towards certain products or services. Facial care products are widely used by all circles, especially Gen-Z. The aim of this study is to obtain sentiment from the specified product reviews and apply the SVM method to predict sentiment classification. The products analyzed consisted of two Emina products, namely sunscreen and face wash and three Make Over products, namely eyebrow pencil, blush, and lipstick. The sentiment results of the five products showed that Make Over blush on products received the most positive sentiment at 98%, while Emina Sunscreen products received the least, with only at 66%. The SVM model in this study showed a good performance in making predictions with accuracy on all five products above 80%. In addition, the level of accuracy of the SVM model in classifying that the data is included in the positive class on the five products is also good because it has a recall value of > 75%. The results of this study can be used as an evaluation for PT. Paragon Technology and Innovation to continuously improve product quality and SVM models can be used to predict classification in other studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it