Assessing Remote Sensing-Based Maize Crop Biophysical Characteristics and Evapotranspiration Estimations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The rapid growth in population, climate variability, and decreasing water resources necessitate innovative agricultural practices to ensure food security and resource conservation. This study investigates the effectiveness of various multispectral imagery from remote sensing (RS) platforms, Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS), PlanetDove microsatellites, Sentinel-2, Landsat 8/9, and proximal MSR-5 in assessing crop biophysical characteristics (CBPCs) and actual crop evapotranspiration (ETa) for maize fields in northeastern Colorado. The research aims to evaluate the accuracy of vegetation indices (VIs) derived from these platforms in estimating key CBPCs, including leaf area index (LAI), crop height (Hc), and fractional vegetation cover (Fc), as well as ETa. Field experiments were conducted during 2022 at the USDA-ARS Limited Irrigation Research Farm in Greeley, Colorado, U.S.A., using different irrigation strategies. Surface reflectance data collected using a handled sensor and observed LAI, Hc, and Fc values, served as ground truth for validating RS estimates. The study applied various statistical analyses to compare the performance of different RS platforms and models. Results indicate that higher-resolution platforms, particularly UAS, provided higher accuracy in estimating VIs and CBPCs than satellite platforms. The study also highlights the influence of environmental conditions on the accuracy of RS models, with locally calibrated models outperforming those developed in dissimilar conditions. The findings underscore the potential of advanced RS technologies in enhancing precision agriculture practices and optimizing water resource management.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".