The Influence of Alexithymia on Social Anxiety of Senior High School Students
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To analyze the current situation of high school students' alexithymia and social anxiety, and on this basis, to explore the effect of alexithymia on social anxiety. The Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20) and the Social Anxiety Scale (SAS-A) was used as instruments to measure and analyze 1,736 high school students in the city of W. (1) The high percentage of high school students in the high subgroup of alexithymia difficulties was higher at 59.68%, and 66.65% of high school students had a social anxiety score > 30.11; (2) High school girls had significantly higher total alexithymia scores than boys (p < 0.05), non-only children had higher total alexithymia scores than only children (p < 0.001), and high school girls had significantly higher social anxiety scores than boys (p < 0.001); (3) High school students' alexithymia and social anxiety were significantly positively correlated (r = 0.496, p < 0.01), and all three dimensions of alexithymia were significantly positively correlated with all three dimensions of social anxiety; (4) The coefficient of determination of alexithymia on social anxiety was 0.284. Alexithymia is an important influence on social anxiety in high school students.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".