Climatic controls of fire activity in the red pine forests of eastern North America
Bibliographic record
Abstract
• Fire histories over red pine distribution range revealed a strong climate signal. • PNA+ and PNA+/ENSO+ consistently correlated with fire-prone conditions. • The fire-prone climate states decreased in 1850 and increased during 1900s. Large-scale modes of climate variability influence forest fire activity and may modulate the future patterns of natural disturbances. We studied the effects of long-term changes in climate upon the fire regime in the red pine forests of eastern North America using (a) a network of sites with dendrochronological reconstructions of fire histories over 1700–1900 A.D., (b) reconstructed chronologies of climate indices (1700–1900), and (c) 20th century observational records of climate indices, local surface climate and fire (1950s-2021). We hypothesized that (H1) there are states of atmospheric circulation that are consistently associated with increased fire activity, (H2) these states mark periods of increased climatological fire hazard, and (H3) the observed decline in fire activity in the 20th century is associated with a long-term decline in the frequency of fire-prone states. At the annual scale, years with significantly higher fire activity in the reconstructed and modern fire records were consistently associated with the positive phases of the Pacific North American pattern (PNA), either independently or in combination with the positive phase of the El Niño-Southern Oscillation index (ENSO). During years with both ENSO and PNA in their positive state, the region experienced positive mid-tropospheric heights and temperature anomalies resulting in drought conditions. The fire-prone climate states identified in the reconstructed records became less frequent in 1850 but re-emerged in the 20th century. While our study did not demonstrate a direct influence of climate on the observed decrease in fire activity in the 20th century, it does reveal a clear climate signal embedded within the fire history reconstruction of the region over the past centuries. This study underscores the importance of considering large-scale climatic patterns in understanding historical fire regimes and highlights their role for future fire dynamics in the region and shaping ecological effects of future fires.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".