AI-Enhanced Prediction of Aortic Stenosis Progression
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: Aortic valve stenosis (AS) is a progressive chronic disease with progression rates that vary in patients and therefore difficult to predict. Objectives: The aim of this study was to predict the progression of AS using comprehensive and longitudinal patient data. Methods: Machine and deep learning algorithms were trained on a data set of 303 patients enrolled in the PROGRESSA (Metabolic Determinants of the Progression of Aortic Stenosis) study who underwent clinical and echocardiographic follow-up on an annual basis. Performance of the models was measured to predict disease progression over long (next 5 years) and short (next 2 years) terms and was compared to a standard clinical model with usually used features in clinical settings based on logistic regression. Results: For each annual follow-up visit including baseline, we trained various supervised learning algorithms in predicting disease progression at 2- and 5-year terms. At both terms, LightGBM consistently outperformed other models with the highest average area under curves across patient visits (0.85 at 2 years, 0.83 at 5 years). Recurrent neural network-based models (Gated Recurrent Unit and Long Short-Term Memory) and XGBoost also demonstrated strong predictive capabilities, while the clinical model showed the lowest performance. Conclusions: This study demonstrates how an artificial intelligence-guided approach in clinical routine could help enhance risk stratification of AS. It presents models based on multisource comprehensive data to predict disease progression and clinical outcomes in patients with mild-to-moderate AS at baseline.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".