MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Iterative Learning Control for Melt Pool Depth Consistency in Directed Energy Deposition

2024· article· en· W4402437156 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIterative Learning Control Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsDeposition (geology)Iterative learning controlConsistency (knowledge bases)Computer scienceEnergy (signal processing)Control (management)Materials scienceGeologyArtificial intelligenceMathematicsGeomorphologyStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Porosity is a critical defect affecting the quality of parts produced by the Directed Energy Deposition (DED) process, with its formation significantly influenced by the melt pool depth (MPD). Despite extensive research on controlling melt pool dimensions and temperature, advancements in MPD control are stymied by the inability to directly observe it during the DED process. Here, we present an innovative Iterative Learning Control (ILC) framework for enhancing MPD consistency in DED. Leveraging a simulation-based process design, our research showcases the capability of ILC in achieving precise control over MPD, reducing MPD variance between layers. Through comparative analyses, the proposed approach is evidenced to outperform traditional MPD control strategies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.980
Threshold uncertainty score0.737

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicIterative Learning Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207