MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Gaussian-Sum Filter for Range-based 3D Relative Pose Estimation in the Presence of Ambiguities

2024· article· en· W4402437222 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotics and Sensor-Based Localization
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique MontréalMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRange (aeronautics)GaussianPoseComputer scienceGaussian filterEstimationArtificial intelligenceGaussian processFilter (signal processing)AlgorithmMathematicsComputer visionPhysicsEngineeringImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multi-robot systems must have the ability to accurately estimate relative states between robots in order to perform collaborative tasks, possibly with no external aiding. Three-dimensional relative pose estimation using range measurements oftentimes suffers from a finite number of non-unique solutions, or ambiguities. This paper: 1) identifies and accurately estimates all possible ambiguities in 2D; 2) treats them as components of a Gaussian mixture model; and 3) presents a computationally-efficient estimator, in the form of a Gaussian-sum filter (GSF), to realize range-based relative pose estimation in an infrastructure-free, 3D, setup. This estimator is evaluated in simulation and experiment and is shown to avoid divergence to local minima induced by the ambiguous poses. Furthermore, the proposed GSF outperforms an extended Kalman filter, demonstrates similar performance to the computationally-demanding particle filter, and is shown to be consistent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.983
Threshold uncertainty score0.184

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRobotics and Sensor-Based LocalizationFrench-language works237,207