MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402438588 · doi:10.11159/iccpe24.111

Conversion of Sustainable Oil into Jet Fuel Using Low Pressure Green Hydrogen

2024· article· en· W4402438588 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ashraf Zin, Alberto Casetta, Carlo U. Perotto, Andrea Dolfi, Bagrat Godibadze

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the World Congress on Mechanical, Chemical, and Material Engineering · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicAdvanced Combustion Engine Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJet fuelHydrogenEnvironmental scienceHydrogen fuelJet (fluid)Materials sciencePetroleum engineeringWaste managementAerospace engineeringEngineeringChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The ever-increasing demand for aviation fuel has strategically placed sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) as a key solution to decarbonise the aviation industry towards net zero emission.The sector currently contributes over 1bn tonnes of CO2 per annum, over 2% of the entire global amount.Sustainable oil conversion into synthetic fuel by catalytic deoxygenation (DO) is one of the distinctive research topics in biorefinery to achieve SAF.The process focuses to convert oxygenates present in sustainable oil into hydrocarbon, which is then upgraded and refined further to form drop-in fuel i.e., gasoline, aviation fuel or diesel.The present study revolves around the creation of highly active sulfided catalyst for the purpose of removing oxygenates in sustainable oil derived from lipid-based material using either low pressure molecular hydrogen (H2) or in-situ green H2 production from limonene dehydrogenation.Unlike typical catalyst synthesis method, a unique catalyst synthesis process was utilised, involving a single-step calcination of thiomolybdate salts under inert atmosphere to form a catalyst composition that consist of bulk molybdenum disulfides (MoS2) and structural carbon.Subsequently, the catalyst was analysed using extensive characterization techniques to understand the chemical composition and catalyst morphology.Initial assessment to convert model compound (fatty acids) in batch reactor system indicated that the catalyst exhibited remarkable HDO conversion under low pressure hydrogen test conditions, outperforming conventional refinery catalyst.Additionally, the study highlighted the importance of bulk catalyst over supported catalyst for deoxygenation reactions of oxygenated compound, as supported catalyst inherently limits number of active sites available for the reactions especially at the designated test conditions.The capability of the catalyst was further proven with the complete conversion of lipid materials at low pressure hydrogen, highlighting promising potential of the catalyst in real world application.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.093
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the World Congress on Mechanical, Chemical, and Material EngineeringSame topicAdvanced Combustion Engine TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207