MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402438800 · doi:10.11159/htff24.001

High Accuracy, Computationally Efficient Modeling of RadiationTransfer in Gases

2024· article· en· W4402438800 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Brent W. Webb

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the World Congress on Mechanical, Chemical, and Material Engineering · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicGas Dynamics and Kinetic Theory
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceRadiationTransfer (computing)Environmental scienceRemote sensingParallel computingGeologyPhysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Radiation is a contributing and sometimes dominant mode of heat transfer in many gaseous applications, and its neglect in transport calculations can result in significant errors in predicted wall fluxes and local gas temperature.Rigorous prediction of the radiative transfer in gas mixtures at high temperature is extraordinarily difficult, owing to the highly complex spectral behavior of gases.The absorption/emission spectrum of real gases includes hundreds of thousands of narrow spectral lines whose strength varies by several orders of magnitude, and depends on radiating gas species and concentration, local temperature, and total pressure.This makes rigorous spectral integration of the Radiative Transfer Equation (RTE) in gas radiative transfer unusually challenging.Line-by-line spectral integration is possible, but tremendously expensive computationally, and is prohibitive in multidimensional and combined mode problems.So-called global methods have been developed as engineering approaches to the prediction of radiative heat transfer in high-temperature gases.The first such global method to be proposed was the Spectral Line Weighted-sum-of-gray-gases (SLW) model, which reorders the complex highly oscillatory gas absorption cross-section into a smooth monotonically increasing distribution function.Simplistically, this model replaces integration of the RTE over wavenumber (or wavelength) by an integration over absorption cross-section.As a result, the number of integrations may be reduced from millions to just a handful.It has been found that the SLW model yields predictive accuracy within a few percent of the lineby-line solution but with computation time on the order of 10 -5 that of the LBL solution.This presentation will briefly outline the theoretical complexities of predicting radiation in real gases.The fundamental concept behind the SLW model will then be outlined for situations of increasing difficulty ranging from single-component isothermal gas scenarios to multicomponent systems with locally varying species concentrations and temperature.The model's application in select multimode heat transfer problems is illustrated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.471
Threshold uncertainty score0.455

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the World Congress on Mechanical, Chemical, and Material EngineeringSame topicGas Dynamics and Kinetic TheoryFrench-language works237,207