MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402439068 · doi:10.11159/icmie24.101

3D Printed Prototype for Water-soluble Polymer Preparation: PLC Operation

2024· article· en· W4402439068 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ziyad Kaidar, Waleed AlSedra, Mohammad AlShamrani, Faisal AlShamrani, Abdulhafiz AlKhateeb, Mohammad Hayal Alotaibi

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the World Congress on Mechanical, Chemical, and Material Engineering · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdditive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
Keywords3d printedPolymerComputer scienceWater solubleMaterials scienceManufacturing engineeringEngineeringChemistryComposite materialOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Water-soluble polymers (WSPs) are commonly used in different oil and gas applications, such as enhanced oil recovery (EOR), drilling fluids, disposal water treatment, and partially in cementing.Water-soluble polymers are prepared manually in small amounts at laboratories.However, such a preparation method could have multiple disadvantages, such as: human error, poor consistency, high process lead time, adjustment of powder batches, and waste materials.To overcome such limitations, we propose a novel methodology to automate the polymer preparation processes through implementing multiple advanced stages.These processes consist of initial design, software programming, as well as advanced 3D printing and manufacturing.First, the solid work design software is utilized to make the original model.Second, the generated model is constructed using 3D printing technology.Finally, the programmable logic controller (PLC) is connected to operate the automation process including polymer doses and mixing time.At the designing stage, internal components might hinder the preparation and mixing processes.Therefore, the placement of such internal components is considered to ensure flow continuity and solution homogeneity.The system components consist of funnel, hollow pipe, screw extruder, vertical powder banks, electrical valves, rotating motor, and nozzle.The optimum design is then sent to 3D printing for manufacturing at high resolution.The PLC is operated to function the whole system.The applied PLC components and setup are: three input gates, three timers, and five output gates.In short, the novel automated preparation system in this study will eventually produce more homogenous and consistent polymeric solutions.In addition, it will minimize the common encountered uncertainties in the conventional methods.It will produce a more representative solution and improve the mixing process.The new system can be also upgraded to improve chemical mixing procedures at large volumes in oil and gas operations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.040

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the World Congress on Mechanical, Chemical, and Material EngineeringSame topicAdditive Manufacturing and 3D Printing TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207