MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402439209 · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0307815

Radiomics analysis of baseline computed tomography to predict oncological outcomes in patients treated for resectable colorectal cancer liver metastasis

2024· article· en· W4402439209 on OpenAlexafffund
Emmanuel Montagnon, Milena Cerny, Vincent Hamilton, Thomas Derennes, André Ilinca, Mohamed El Amine Elforaici, Gilbert Jabbour, Edmond Rafie, Anni Wu, Francisco Romero, Alexandre Cadrin-Chênevert, Samuel Kadoury, Simon Turcotte, An Tang

Bibliographic record

VenuePLoS ONE · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Canadian institutionsCegep regional de LanaudiereEricsson (Canada)Polytechnique MontréalHôpital du Sacré-Cœur de MontréalUniversité LavalUniversité de MontréalCentre Intégré de Santé et de Services Sociaux des LaurentidesCentre intégré de santé et de services sociaux de Chaudière-AppalachesCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal
FundersFonds de Recherche du Québec - SantéInstitut de Valorisation des Données
KeywordsMedicineConcordanceColorectal cancerReceiver operating characteristicConfidence intervalRadiomicsInternal medicineOncologyRadiologyCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine and compare the performance of pre-treatment clinical risk score (CRS), radiomics models based on computed (CT), and their combination for predicting time to recurrence (TTR) and disease-specific survival (DSS) in patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed a prospectively maintained registry of 241 patients treated with systemic chemotherapy and surgery for colorectal cancer liver metastases. Radiomics features were extracted from baseline, pre-treatment, contrast-enhanced CT images. Multiple aggregation strategies were investigated for cases with multiple metastases. Radiomics signatures were derived using feature selection methods. Random survival forests (RSF) and neural network survival models (DeepSurv) based on radiomics features, alone or combined with CRS, were developed to predict TTR and DSS. Leveraging survival models predictions, classification models were trained to predict TTR within 18 months and DSS within 3 years. Classification performance was assessed with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) on the test set. RESULTS: For TTR prediction, the concordance index (95% confidence interval) was 0.57 (0.57-0.57) for CRS, 0.61 (0.60-0.61) for RSF in combination with CRS, and 0.70 (0.68-0.73) for DeepSurv in combination with CRS. For DSS prediction, the concordance index was 0.59 (0.59-0.59) for CRS, 0.57 (0.56-0.57) for RSF in combination with CRS, and 0.60 (0.58-0.61) for DeepSurv in combination with CRS. For TTR classification, the AUC was 0.33 (0.33-0.33) for CRS, 0.77 (0.75-0.78) for radiomics signature alone, and 0.58 (0.57-0.59) for DeepSurv score alone. For DSS classification, the AUC was 0.61 (0.61-0.61) for CRS, 0.57 (0.56-0.57) for radiomics signature, and 0.75 (0.74-0.76) for DeepSurv score alone. CONCLUSION: Radiomics-based survival models outperformed CRS for TTR prediction. More accurate, noninvasive, and early prediction of patient outcome may help reduce exposure to ineffective yet toxic chemotherapy or high-risk major hepatectomies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.459
Threshold uncertainty score0.515

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePLoS ONESame topicRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical ImagingFrench-language works237,207