MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4402444254 · doi:10.1139/cjss-2024-0060

Comparison of conventional methods with Haney H3A version 4 for available phosphorus and potassium in southern Manitoba soils

2024· article· en· W4402444254 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Stephen Crittenden, Oscar I. Molina, Steve Sager, Curtis Cavers, Zisheng Xing, Mervin St. Luce, Yvonne Lawley

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Soil Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSoil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
FundersAlberta Canola Producers CommissionCanola Council of CanadaSaskatchewan Canola Development CommissionWestern Grains Research Foundation
KeywordsSoil waterPotassiumPhosphorusEnvironmental scienceSoil scienceChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The H3A-4 extraction is a new method to determine plant available nutrients but has not been compared with standard soil tests or calibrated to crop response in Manitoba, Canada. Olsen P and ammonium acetate K were related to H3A-4 P and K for 961 soil samples. Significant relations were found between Olsen P and H3A-4 ( R2 = 0.74, P < 0.01) and ammonium acetate K and H3A-4 ( R2 = 0.83, P < 0.01). New thresholds were established for fertilizer recommendations with H3A-4 as 24 mg kg–1 for P and 32 mg kg–1 for K.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.270
Threshold uncertainty score0.543

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.253 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Soil Science→Same topicSoil and Water Nutrient Dynamics→French-language works237,207→