MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402451286 · doi:10.1109/jsyst.2024.3454938

Editorial

2024· editorial· es· W4402451286 on OpenAlexaff
Amir Aghdam

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Systems Journal · 2024
Typeeditorial
Languagees
FieldDecision Sciences
Topicscientometrics and bibliometrics research
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Following the elimination of the journal's backlog, as previously reported, there is a significant reduction in the publication time of the papers in an issue (although papers are accessible earlier online as advance postings on Xplore shortly after they are accepted). This is a big step toward disseminating the latest research results in the shortest possible time in a journal issue, making them more accessible to the research community. The new journal metrics were announced in June, reporting an Impact Factor of 4 and a CiteScore of 9.8, thus all performance indices indicate its healthy status.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.025
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.960
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.025
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0090.011
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0400.041

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.342
GPT teacher head0.555
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Systems JournalSame topicscientometrics and bibliometrics researchFrench-language works237,207