MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402451781 · doi:10.3389/fgene.2024.1481705

Editorial: Diagnosis, animal models and therapeutic interventions for neuromuscular diseases

2024· editorial· en· W4402451781 on OpenAlexaff
Muthukumar Karuppasamy, Martine Tétreault, Jessica Rosati

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in Genetics · 2024
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePsychological interventionIntensive care medicineBioinformaticsBiologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neuromuscular disorders (NMDs) are a group of rare diseases that largely affect the muscles, peripheral nervous system and neuromuscular junctions. Several genetic variations are associated with various types of NMDs. The fatal consequences of NMDs include skeletal muscle waste, reduction in muscle strength, muscle degeneration, neuropathy, spinal cord and neuromuscular junction abnormalities, sensory and motor impairment, lack of mobility and/or defects in heart and lungs [1][2][3] . The clinical diagnosis and the clinical management of NMDs in children and adults is very challenging since the majority of NMDs patients present unspecific clinical and pathological features that are similar between NMD sutypes 4,5 . The current diagnostic approaches include genetic testing, biochemical evaluation, muscle and nerve biopsy, computerized tomography, electromyography and magnetic resonance imaging [6][7][8][9] .Technological progress has greatly improved our ability to diagnosed patients affected with NMDs; however, the majority are still very limited treatment options 10 . As an example, Duchenne muscular dystrophy patients have been treated with corticosteroids which exhibit detrimental adverse effects such as weight gain, behavioral problems and fragile bones. As for modeling of diseases, there are currently no efficient animal models to recapitulate key phenotypes seen in most NMDs patients. Absence of animal models further hinders the drug development for NMDs. Therefore, therapeutic strategies aimed at curing these NMDs efficiently are warranted now. The drug discovery and development approaches including gene editing, drug repurposing, RNA-based intervention and gene replacement therapy have greatly helped toward clinical trials and other drug developmental phases conducted for various NMDs. In the current scenario, creating novel animal models, gene therapy and biomarkers for NMDs have been on the rise as it may be beneficial in understanding disease pathology, evaluating variant-specific therapeutic interventions and advancing them into patient use. The key goal of this research topic is to report novel diagnosis, therapeutic interventions, animal models, disease management in NMDs. This topic is also aimed at incorporating the newer diagnostic approach or genetic screening method for any NMDs. Multiple manuscripts were submitted for the publication of this research topic and a few articles were accepted and published.Tang et al. presented a case carrying a variant in the SCP2 gene (OMIM number: 184755), known for its involvement in the process of peroxisomal beta oxidation. To date, only two cases of SCPx deficiency have been reported. This patient has symmetrical lesions of the thalamus and brainstem, as previously described, but this variant causes a notably different clinical phenotype characterized by episodic psychosis. It may be suggested that homozygosity for a rare variant brings to question potential for consanguinity and other potential causes of an unusual phenotype. The authors identified a homozygous splicing variant resulting in skipping of exon 8 and the consequent loss of 29 amino acids in the SCP2 protein. In another study, Swindell conducted a metaanalysis of six lower motor neuron gene expression studies obtained by laser-capture microdissection of post-mortem spinal cord from ALS and control subjects. Of note, the six datasets included 56 ALS patients (with both sporadic and genetic ALS such as C9ORF72, SOD1 and CHMP2B) and 37 healthy donors. This study identified 500 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) among ALS and CTL samples highlighting 10 key functional categories implicated in the disease. The analysis also connected ALS transcriptomics to genetics, first by demonstrating overlap between DEGs and genes near ALS-associated SNP loci, and second by identifying putative DNA regulatory elements disrupted or engendered by ALS-associated SNP variants. The author also compared these DEGs with DEGs from dissected motor neurons from both the SOD1-G93A mice and the iPSC-MNs. In the last model, most DEGs were not replicated. The outcome from this study could be beneficial in exploring the disease mechanisms and genetics underlying ALS. Wang et al performed a systematic review and meta-analysis for diagnostic utility of long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) in multiple sclerosis (MS). The authors used the AUADAS-2 tool to test the selected studies from various Chinese and English literature databases. The meta-analysis included data from 12 articles and 24 studies. This study outlined the key role of lncRNAs in the diagnosis of MS, especially in distinguishing relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) from healthy controls and across various MS subtypes. Thus, the authors demonstrate a critical role of lncRNAs not only in the diagnosis of MS, but also in predicting its progression and assessing disease severity suggesting that the integration of lncRNAs into clinical practice could significantly improve the management and stratification of MS patients, providing a basis for personalized therapeutic strategies.Gao et al reported a two sample Mendelian randomization study on the relationship of interferon-γ and interleukin-18 upstream of intervertebral disc degeneration (IVDD). They used publicly available inflammatory cytokines and IVDD GWAS data and demonstrated the casual relationship between IFN-γ and IL-18 and IVDD via instrumental variable analysis. This study could offer invaluable insights on IVDD monitoring, prevention and screening of drug targets.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.057

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.003
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0040.005
Open science0.0040.001
Research integrity0.0120.014
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.016

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.314 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in GeneticsSame topicNeurogenetic and Muscular Disorders ResearchFrench-language works237,207