MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4402452662 · doi:10.11159/mvml24.111

Stage U-Net Framework: Streamlining MRI Reconstruction From Under-sampled K-Space

2024· article· en· W4402452662 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Aya Mohamed ElBehairy, Inas A. Yassine, Mustafa Elattar

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the World Congress on Electrical Engineering and Computer Systems and Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMedical Imaging Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStage (stratigraphy)Computer scienceSpace (punctuation)Net (polyhedron)MathematicsGeologyGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Magnetic resonance Image MRI with various protocols is extensively used for diagnosis because it gives detailed images.Still, its acquisition time is excessively long, which causes motion artifacts due to patient impatience.To accelerate, two key strategies were utilized to decrease acquisition time parallel imaging and compressed sensing.Parallel imaging reduces time by simultaneously capturing subsampled MRI data acquired from multiple receiver coils.Compressed sensing acquires partially observed k-space data using regularized iterative optimization techniques.Both methods provide complementary possibilities for speeding up MRI acquisition.Recently Our proposed architecture uses an exclusive two-phase technique, Image2Image Understanding and Reconstruction, to rebuild MR images from under-sampled k-space data.In the first phase, a U-Net is trained on images reconstructed from full sampled k-space, laying the groundwork for future reconstruction.In the second phase to subsample images we apply the radial mask to k-space: a Fourier transform.The reconstructed images from subsampled k-space are used to train the trained U-Net from the first phase to improve image details as if it is reconstructed from a fully sampled k-space.This dual-phase technique improves performance by modifying the U-Net to learn image structure from fully sampled k-space first, establishing a solid foundation for future high-quality image reconstruction from subsampled k-space.The stability created in the first step saves time and minimizes processing power needs in the second phase.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.017

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the World Congress on Electrical Engineering and Computer Systems and Science→Same topicMedical Imaging Techniques and Applications→French-language works237,207→