Bibliographic record
Abstract
The main focus of this study is to develop a structural concept for an extendable wing for munition utilizing lattice cell assisted topology optimization followed by size optimization of the radii of the strut-based lattice cells.The topology optimization of the design space of the wing structure is performed using the Solid Isotropic Material with Penalization (SIMP) method for minimum compliance subject to volume fraction constraint.Depending on the relative density distribution, the topology optimized region is filled with strut-based lattice structures.Following the lattice assisted topology optimization, size optimizations for the radii of the lattice cells are performed using single and multi-objective functions.The resulting optimized wing structures are compared with each other in terms of their mechanical performances and weight.The results shows that the mechanical performance of the wing structure can be increased by employing lattice cell structures.Size optimizations performed using single and multi-objective functions also showed that the mechanical performances of the lattice assisted topology optimized wing structures are very close to each other and as a result of two level optimization approximately 17.5% weight reduction is achieved.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".