MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402455257 · doi:10.11159/htff24.270

Numerical Simulation of Cryogenic Fluid Sloshing In Propellant Tank and Influence of Damping with Ring Baffles Under Forced Excitations

2024· article· en· W4402455257 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sajid Momin, Pradeep Kumar P, A. Salih

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the World Congress on Mechanical, Chemical, and Material Engineering · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSpacecraft and Cryogenic Technologies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSlosh dynamicsBafflePropellantMechanicsComputer simulationMaterials sciencePhysicsEngineeringAerospace engineeringMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sloshing phenomena in fluid systems have emerged as a significant challenge with wide-ranging implications across various engineering domains, including aerospace and cryogenic storage.This paper presents a comprehensive study of sloshing effects in cryogenic propellant tanks, focusing on the behaviour of liquid oxygen as the working fluid.Sufficient works are present in literature demonstrating predictability of sloshing dynamics without phase change.Specific parameters governing the evaporation and condensation of cryogenic fluids introduces distinct challenges.In this paper, the numerical behaviour of sloshing is simulated using Ansys Fluent with a Volume of Fluid (VOF) model and the Lee model to handle phase change.Through numerical simulations, the study investigates the effect of baffles with different sizes under various excitation frequencies, to enhance our understanding and mitigation strategies for sloshing-related issues in cryogenic fluid systems.Selection of an appropriate baffles in cryogenic propellant tanks is a concern for safe operation during the entire flight duration in aerospace vehicles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.062
Threshold uncertainty score0.534

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.203
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the World Congress on Mechanical, Chemical, and Material EngineeringSame topicSpacecraft and Cryogenic TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207