MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402455728 · doi:10.1145/3695877

Category-Level Pose Estimation and Iterative Refinement for Monocular RGB-D Image

2024· article· en· W4402455728 on OpenAlexaff
Yongtang Bao, Chunjian Su, Yutong Qi, Haojie Li

Bibliographic record

VenueACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing Communications and Applications · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotics and Sensor-Based Localization
Canadian institutionsThe Scarborough HospitalUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceComputer visionMonocularPoseRGB color model

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Category-level pose estimation is proposed to predict the 6D pose of objects under a specific category and has wide applications in fields such as robotics, virtual reality, and autonomous driving. With the development of VR/AR technology, pose estimation has gradually become a research hotspot in 3D scene understanding. However, most methods fail to fully utilize geometric and color information to solve intra-class shape variations, which leads to inaccurate prediction results. To solve the above problems, we propose a novel pose estimation and iterative refinement network, use an attention mechanism to fuse multi-modal information to obtain color features after a coordinate transformation, and design iterative modules to ensure the accuracy of object geometric features. Specifically, we use an encoder-decoder architecture to implicitly generate a coarse-grained initial pose and refine it through an iterative refinement module. In addition, due to the differences between rotation and position estimation, we design a multi-head pose decoder that utilizes the local geometry and global features. Finally, we design a transformer-based coordinate transformation attention module to extract pose-sensitive features from RGB images and supervise color information by correlating point cloud features in different coordinate systems. We train and test our network on the synthetic dataset CAMERA25 and the real dataset REAL275. Experimental results show that our method achieves state-of-the-art performance on multiple evaluation metrics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.032

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing Communications and ApplicationsSame topicRobotics and Sensor-Based LocalizationFrench-language works237,207