MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402460048 · doi:10.1386/jem_00117_1

On synchronicity: Green shipping’s logistical and real-time media

2024· article· en· W4402460048 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Environmental Media · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMaritime Ports and Logistics
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSynchronicityBusinessComputer sciencePsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the past two decades, underwater ocean noise has emerged as an issue of global ecological concern. Commercial shipping is responsible for approximately 80 per cent of the industrial ocean soundscape. These high levels of acoustic emissions, and their impact on marine life, present reputational and regulatory risks to the shipping and logistics industry, threatening to place limits on vessel movement and the imperatives of just-in-time circulation. In this context, underwater noise management is becoming a significant site of state and industry-led greening efforts. This article examines the use of smart ocean systems in mitigating the sonic impacts of just-in-time shipping, focusing on the Port of Vancouver’s Enhancing Cetacean Habitation and Observation (ECHO) programme. Launched in 2014, ECHO develops initiatives to reduce sonic threats to marine mammals, particularly the endangered Southern Resident Killer Whale (SRKW), whose habitat overlaps with shipping lanes surrounding Canada’s largest port. As a smart ocean programme, ECHO aims to employ real-time management to synchronize the spatio-temporal rhythms of transiting whales and ships. How do logistical media and the temporal dynamics of just-in-time circulation intersect with environmental management and smart ocean governance? The article addresses this question by analysing the media and logics of real-time monitoring and response in environmental management in relation to just-in-time as a production philosophy that has underwritten logistical capitalism. By bringing work on smart oceans and marine governance into conversation with studies of logistics and logistical media, it considers how real-time sensing infrastructures are shaping management practices at the nexus of logistics and environmental governance. In doing so, it aims to shed light on the ways that the increasing use of digital sensing technologies are shaping management practices at the nexus of logistics and environmental governance. While underwater noise cast as pollution threatens to impede commodity flows, this article traces how certain actors in the industry are leveraging real-time sensing networks to coordinate circulation and maintain profitability in the emerging green shipping economy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.801
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it