MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402460544 · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.4c04690

Comprehensive DFT Study of Two-Dimensional Molybdenene and Molybdenum Carbide Phases

2024· article· en· W4402460544 on OpenAlexafffund
Sergey Gusarov, Jaafar Jalilian, Gap Soo Chang, Mosayeb Naseri

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry C · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicGraphene research and applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of SaskatchewanNational Research Council Canada
FundersNational Research Council CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsMolybdenumMaterials scienceCarbideMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Metallic characteristics of the recently synthesized two-dimensional Mo atoms (referred to as molybdenene) [ Sahu, T. K. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2023, 18, 1430–1438.] promise significant potential for applications in molecular sensing, electron imaging, and scanning probe microscopy. In this work, the structural stability and electronic and optical properties of potential phases of a two-dimensional (2D) molybdenene monolayer have been investigated by employing comprehensive density functional theory. While the phonon dispersion spectra of possible molybdenene structures reveal dynamic and phase instability in free-standing, perfectly flat molybdenene sheets, our results identify two phases of molybdenene monolayers with energetic and dynamic stabilities: a buckled hexagonal structure and a zigzag-shaped structure. Further analysis of the electronic and optical properties of these predicted monolayer materials reveals that all of them exhibit a metallic nature. Additionally, we investigated the possible formation of two-dimensional double-layer molybdenene and found two highly stable structures derived from the zigzag structure and three from the buckled hexagonal structure, all of which are more favorable than the corresponding parent monolayer structures. Finally, the synthesizability of two-dimensional MoC monolayers, which have recently attracted significant attention due to their promising catalytic applications, has also been investigated. Our findings suggest that the bottom-up design is theoretically possible based on molybdenene and T-carbon structure as reactants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.309 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2024
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry CSame topicGraphene research and applicationsFrench-language works237,207