MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402464069 · doi:10.11159/mvml24.122

Personalized Fashion Product Recommendations using Transfer Learning and Nearest Neighbors Models

2024· article· en· W4402464069 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the World Congress on Electrical Engineering and Computer Systems and Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTechnology and Data Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCentre National pour la Recherche Scientifique et Technique
KeywordsComputer scienceProduct (mathematics)Transfer of learningTransfer (computing)Artificial intelligenceMathematicsParallel computing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the fashion retail e-commerce sector, personalized product recommendations are crucial for enhancing the shopping experience.This study introduces a method that combines a pre-trained deep learning model named VGG19 with the 10 nearest neighbors algorithm to recommend visually similar products.VGG19 is utilized to extract detailed features from product images, enabling more accurate recommendations.The nearest neighbors algorithm then selects the ten products most similar to those previously viewed by customers.Recommendations are ranked based on customer purchase frequency to prioritize the most popular and relevant items.This method's practical applicability was demonstrated by testing it on a diverse set of products, including jackets from outerwear, baby bodysuits from children's wear, socks from footwear, and sunglasses from the accessories category.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.992
Threshold uncertainty score0.533

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it