MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402464131 · doi:10.11159/mvml24.118

Advancing Signal Processing through Transfer Learning Innovations in Health industry

2024· article· en· W4402464131 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Azadeh Kooshesh, Alke Martens, Robin Nicolay

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the World Congress on Electrical Engineering and Computer Systems and Science · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicExperimental Learning in Engineering
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversität Rostock
KeywordsSignal processingTechnology transferComputer scienceTransfer of learningSIGNAL (programming language)Digital signal processingKnowledge managementArtificial intelligenceComputer hardware

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Our investigation addresses the critical deficit of high-fidelity electrocardiogram (ECG) datasets essential for detecting cardiac anomalies in advanced medical applications.In cardiology, capturing seismocardiograms (SCG) through sensors like wearable devices and smartphones during daily activities is more practical than obtaining ECGs.To facilitate the transformation of SCG to ECG, we explored advanced signal conversion architectures.Converting SCG to ECG signals is imperative, as ECGs provide a direct and reliable measure of cardiac electrical activity, crucial for accurate detection and diagnosis of cardiac anomalies.Among various models for transforming medical timeseries signals, we selected the Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) Autoencoder SCG-to-ECG architecture as a target pipeline.We aimed to enhance the efficiency and accuracy of this architecture by incorporating domain adaptation within the framework of transfer learning.Specifically, we utilized supervised learning and unsupervised learning techniques for domain adaptation and employed homogeneous transfer learning to ensure the effective transfer of knowledge between domains.Additionally, we optimized the pretrained model weights through weight pruning, rather than traditional fine-tuning methods.This dual strategy of domain adaptation and weight pruning improves the model's ability to generalize across different datasets while reducing computational complexity and maintaining high diagnostic accuracy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the World Congress on Electrical Engineering and Computer Systems and ScienceSame topicExperimental Learning in EngineeringFrench-language works237,207