MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402468805 · doi:10.1016/j.cirep.2024.200169

Examining the dietary effect of insect meals on the innate immune response of fish: A meta-analysis

2024· article· en· W4402468805 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueComparative Immunology Reports · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInsect Utilization and Effects
Canadian institutionsUniversity of GuelphUniversity of Waterloo
FundersUniversity of Guelph
KeywordsInnate immune systemFish <Actinopterygii>InsectBiologyMeta-analysisImmune systemFish mealZoologyFisheryEcologyImmunologyMedicineInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• A meta-analysis was performed to investigate the effects of insect meal replacement on fish innate immunity. • 40 % of insect meal replacement resulted in the highest upregulated immune response in fish. • 87.5–100 % of insect meal replacement was found to significantly decrease the immune gene expression level in fish. Insect meal inclusion in aquaculture feed has received increased interest as a sustainable alternative to fishmeal and recent evidence has shown additional effects on modulating the immune response. However, lack of effects of insect meal on fish immunity in a few studies have put these beneficial effects into question. The objective of this meta-analysis was to summarize the effects of fishmeal replacement with insect meal on the innate immune response of several fish species based on differential gene expression via qPCR. A systematic literature search was conducted using online databases including Web of Science and ScienceDirect that found 197 studies as of August 2023, however only 20 studies met the criteria of high-quality studies focused on the immune response of fish and were included in this meta-analysis. The most studied insect meal was from black soldier fly, followed by yellow mealworm, and the most commonly analyzed tissue was the liver, followed by the intestine. The effect of fishmeal replacement with insect meal on fish immune responses were examined using a mixed model, with study as the random effect. This meta-analysis found a non-linear (quadratic) relationship ( P = 0.017) between immune gene expression fold change and the level of fishmeal replacement with insect meal. Based on the fitted quadratic curve, a 40 % replacement of fishmeal with insect meal resulted in the highest upregulated immune response in fish. Fish taxonomic family was also found to have an effect ( P = 0.004) on immune gene expression, where the taxonomic family Moronidae was more affected, with an average fold change of 2.783 (± 0.325). Other variables examined, including the insect type, tissue analyzed, dietary crude protein level, did not affect the immune response ( P > 0.05). This meta-analysis also found that dietary lipid had a significant correlation with immune gene expression, and should be taken into consideration in future studies and meta-analyses. These findings are impactful since they provide evidence for the optimal dietary replacement level of insect meals required to significantly affect the innate immune response across several fish species.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.584
Threshold uncertainty score0.540

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.163
GPT teacher head0.314
Teacher spread0.151 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it