MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402472024 · doi:10.1016/j.afos.2024.09.001

Choice of cemented or uncemented stems for displaced femoral neck fractures

2024· article· en· W4402472024 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Kwang‐Kyoun Kim

Bibliographic record

VenueOsteoporosis and Sarcopenia · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOrthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineOrthodonticsFemoral neckDentistrySurgeryOsteoporosisInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Choice of cemented or uncemented stems for displaced femoral neck fracturesWang et al. [1] published about unplanned emergency department visits within 90 days of hip hemiarthroplasty for osteoporotic femoral neck fractures.In this article, they concluded that periprosthetic fractures (PPFs) occurred frequently when uncemented implants were replaced, indicating that cemented implants should be considered initially.Hemiarthroplasty is the conventional therapy for femoral neck fractures.However, the use of bone cement in hemiarthroplasty is controversial.Among the many reasons for concern in choosing the cemented stem, there are bone cement implantation syndrome (BCIS) and difficulties in treating PPF.The incidence of BCIS for femur neck fracture varies widely in the literature between 28% up to 38% [2,3] and an analysis of mortality from the National Hip Fracture Database has revealed that mortality within 24 hours after surgery was significantly higher among patients receiving cemented compared with uncemented hemiarthroplasty (1.6% vs 1.2%, P = 0.030), suggesting excess early mortality related to BCIS [4].Dahl et al. [5] reported that the risk of death within 48 hours of hip hemiarthroplasty between cemented and uncemented implants.Compared with the uncemented group, mortality was increased in the cemented group (RR 1.63 [95% CI 1.31 to 2.02]; P < 0.001).Rutter et al.[6] reported that 89 % (55/62) described acute deterioration occurring during or within a few minutes of cement insertion and the vast majority of deaths (33/41, 80%) occurred on the operating table.The surgical treatment of periprosthetic fractures in the femur is always a challenge for the orthopedic surgeon: either an osteosynthesis or a stem change is planned.As described in this article, PPF is known to occur more frequently in the uncemented stem [7].However, in the case of Vancouver type B2 fractures around a cemented implant, this further complicates management by altering the biomechanics and surgical technique [8].Specifically, removal of the cement mantle is required, and this potentially increases operative time, bleeding and risk of perforating the femur [9].Sattar et al. [10] reported a 35% reoperation rate in Vancouver type B2 around cemented stem.To summarize, even though periprosthetic fractures are common in the non-cemented implant group, the authors' conclusion allows readers to decide on the implant type by looking at only a very small tip of the iceberg-like complications of hemiarthroplasty.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.658
Threshold uncertainty score0.744

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOsteoporosis and SarcopeniaSame topicOrthopaedic implants and arthroplastyFrench-language works237,207