Extracting 3D Prostate Geometry from 2D Optically-Tracked Transrectal Ultrasound Images
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The technical challenges of traditional transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy, combined with the limited availability of more advanced prostate imaging techniques, have exacerbated existing differences in prostate cancer outcomes between high-resource and low-resource healthcare settings. The objective of this paper is to improve the tools available to clinicians in low-resource settings by working towards an inexpensive ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy navigation system. The principal contributions detailed here are the design, implementation, and testing of a system capable of generating a 3D model of the prostate from spatially-tracked 2D ultrasound images. The system uses open-source software, low-cost materials, and deep learning to segment and localize cross-sections of the prostate in order to produce a patient-specific 3D prostate model. A user study was performed to evaluate the performance of the system using a simulated patient and ultrasound probe. The results showed that non-clinical users were able to use the system to generate a 3D model of the prostate with minimal training. The capacity to generate a 3D prostate model using readily available technologies has the potential to improve access to navigated biopsy in low-resource settings. Low-cost navigational tools have an important role to play in democratizing access to reliable prostate cancer diagnosis and reducing the burden of disease among those most affected by prostate cancer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".