MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Hierarchical Deep Reinforcement Learning with Cross-attention and Planning for Autonomous Roundabout Navigation

2024· article· en· W4402474508 on OpenAlexaff
Bennet Montgomery, Christian Muise, Sidney Givigi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicRobotic Path Planning Algorithms
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRoundaboutReinforcement learningComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceMotion planningHuman–computer interactionEngineeringTransport engineeringRobot

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Autonomous vehicle control is an important subfield of autonomous vehicle research. Many challenges remain to improve the safety and performance of autonomous vehicle control systems in urban driving environments. One such urban driving environment is the roundabout junction, which presents its own unique challenges to potential solutions to autonomous vehicle control. This paper proposes and tests a vehicle control agent as a candidate solution for urban roundabout navigation. The vehicle control agent is based on a hierarchical deep reinforcement learning architecture with a superior network selecting short-term lane-change behaviour and a subordinate network selecting longitudinal acceleration values. The road sequence followed by the agent is selected by a route planner based on Dijkstra’s algorithm. The proposed agent learns to navigate the roundabout environment safely, reaching the goal state in 100% of validation scenarios after training. The agent also outperforms an agent based on the Krauß-following model in 2 out of 5 tested metrics and matches the performance of the Krauß-following model in the remaining 3 metrics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRobotic Path Planning AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207