White matter disconnection impacts proprioception post-stroke
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Proprioceptive impairments occur in approximately 50-64% of people following stroke. While much is known about the grey matter structures underlying proprioception, our understanding of the white matter correlates of proprioceptive impairments is less well developed. It is recognised that behavioural impairments post-stroke are often the result of disconnection between wide-scale brain networks, however the disconnectome associated with proprioception post-stroke is unknown. In the current study, white matter disconnection was assessed in relation to performance on a robotic arm position matching (APM) task. Neuroimaging and robotic assessments of proprioception were collected for 203 stroke survivors, approximately 2-weeks post-stroke. The robotic assessment was performed in a KINARM Exoskeleton robotic device and consisted of a nine-target APM task. First, the relationship between white matter tract lesion load and performance on the APM task was assessed. Next, differences in the disconnectome between participants with and without impairments on the APM task were examined. Greater lesion load to the superior longitudinal fasciculus (SLF II and III), arcuate fasciculus (all segments) and fronto-insular tracts were associated with worse APM task performance. In those with APM task impairments, there was, additionally, disconnection of the posterior corpus callosum, inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus, inferior longitudinal fasciculus and optic radiations. This study highlights an important perisylvian white matter network supporting proprioceptive processing in the human brain. It also identifies white matter tracts, important for relaying proprioceptive information from parietal and frontal brain regions, that are not traditionally considered proprioceptive in nature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".