Willingness to Fly on Urban Air Mobility Aircraft in Canada
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Urban air mobility (UAM) is projected to be a major part of the future transportation landscape. It has the potential to reduce trip times and is viewed as a low-emission option. However, little is known about the public’s willingness to fly in these vehicles. In this study, a survey was conducted to assess willingness to fly on an air taxi. The survey of 1022 Canadians found that 39.4% were willing to fly after being shown an image of a specific UAM concept aircraft and given a short description about UAM, with another 29.1% stating that they would consider it. Factors leading to a higher level of support included gender, age, career, previous flight behavior, and support for other novel technologies. These results indicate that there is a desire for short-distance air travel, and the recommended next steps include assessing infrastructure needs and investigating regulatory and certification requirements for the introduction of UAM.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it