MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402488123 · doi:10.3390/app14188213

Prediction of Ship-Unloading Time Using Neural Networks

2024· article· en· W4402488123 on OpenAlexaff
Zhen Gao, Danning Li, Danni Wang, Zengcai Yu, Witold Pedrycz, Xinhai Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Sciences · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMaritime Ports and Logistics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersHigher Education Discipline Innovation ProjectNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsArtificial neural networkComputer scienceArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The prediction of unloading times is crucial for reducing demurrage costs and ensuring the smooth scheduling of downstream processes in a steel plant. The duration of unloading a cargo ship is primarily determined by the unloading schedule established at the raw materials terminal and the storage operation schedule implemented in the stockyard. This study aims to provide an accurate forecast of unloading times for incoming ships at the raw materials terminal of a steel plant. We propose three neural network-based methods: the Backpropagation Neural Network (BP), the Random Vector Functional Link (RVFL), and the Stochastic Configurations Network (SCN) for this prediction. This issue has not been previously researched using similar methods, particularly in the context of large-scale steel plants. The performance of these three methods is evaluated based on several indices: the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), the quality of the best solution, convergence, and stability, which are employed for predicting unloading times. The prediction accuracies achieved by the BP, RVFL, and SCN were 76%, 85%, and 87%, respectively. These results demonstrate the effectiveness and potential applications of the proposed methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.386
Threshold uncertainty score0.201

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied SciencesSame topicMaritime Ports and LogisticsFrench-language works237,207