Epigraphical Evidences of Veneration of St. Serapion, Metropolitan Krutitsky, Sarsky and Podonsky in the Trinity Makariev Kalyazin Monastery (18th–19th Centuries)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
В статье анализируется комплекс эпиграфических памятников Троицкого Макарьева Калязина монастыря, сложившийся в последней четверти XVIII–XIX вв. и отразивший основные этапы формирования местного почитания Серапиона, митрополита Крутицкого, Сарского и Подонского. Святитель был уроженцем города Кашина, монашеский постриг принял в Калязине монастыре, здесь же и скончался на покое 2 мая 1653 г. Почитание митрополита Серапиона началось в 1779 г. Основу агиографического комплекса составили эпитафии CIR4049 и CIR4050, в начале XIX в. комплекс пополнила плита с «историческим портретом» святителя (CIR4108), еще позднее — надгробная надпись CIR4109. The paper analyzes the epigraphic monuments of the Trinity Makariev Kalyazin monastery of the last quarter of the 18th–19th centuries, reflecting the main formation stages of local veneration of Serapion, Metropolitan Krutitsky, Sarsky and Podonsky. St. Serapion was a native of the town of Kashin. In the Kalyazin monastery, he took monastic vows, retired, and died on May 2, 1653. Veneration of Metropolitan Serapion began in 1779 after the miraculous healing of a merchant from St. Petersburg. The basis of the hagiographic complex included the epitaphs CIR4049 and CIR4050. At the beginning of the 19th century the complex was supplemented by a plate with a “historical portrait” of the saint (CIR4108), and later — by a tombstone inscription CIR4109.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".