The Scene Logic of Innovative Talent Agglomeration: An Empirical Study Based on 54 Cities in China
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In recent years, China has been steadily implementing its innovation-driven development strategy, underscoring the vital importance of attracting innovative talents to cities. Major cities have come to realize that securing such talent is essential for maintaining sustainable urban competitiveness in the future. This article takes a novel perspective by focusing on the role of urban scenes, with a particular emphasis on the cultural, lifestyle, and quality-of-life factors that are crucial for attracting and retaining innovative talent, which is essential for sustainable urban growth. Utilizing ridge regression analysis, this study scrutinizes the scores across various sub-dimensions of urban ambiance and the location quotient of innovative talent in 54 cities nationwide. We report several findings. Firstly, urban scenes play a pivotal role in talent agglomeration, a critical factor for sustainable development. Secondly, both rational and transgressive scenes positively impact the gathering of scientific and financial talents, with transgressive scenes having a more pronounced effect. Thirdly, self-expressive scenes may counterintuitively impede the clustering of scientific and cultural talents, a finding that contrasts with international research outcomes. In conclusion, this study sheds light on how urban scenes drive the sustainable concentration of innovative talents, thus contributing to the enrichment of theoretical understanding of sustainable talent development and practical insights for policymakers aiming to create urban environments that foster innovation and sustainability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".