MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402497193 · doi:10.1016/j.jag.2024.104137

YOLOShipTracker: Tracking ships in SAR images using lightweight YOLOv8

2024· article· en· W4402497193 on OpenAlexaff
Muhammad Yasir, Shanwei Liu, Saied Pirasteh, Mingming Xu, Hui Sheng, Jianhua Wan, Felipe A. P. de Figueiredo, Fernando J. Aguilar, Jonathan Li

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSynthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeographyCartographyTracking (education)Remote sensingComputer visionArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

• A YOLOShipTracker model was developed for ship tracking using the YOLOv8 model. • HGNetv2 Backbone and Lightweight Neck improve SAR feature extraction. • Decoupled head and knowledge distillation reduce parameters and maintain accuracy. • Development of C-BIoU for accurate tracking with high performance and real-time capability. This paper presents a novel approach to tracking ships in Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) images based on an improved lightweight YOLOv8 Nano (YOLOv8n), specially devised to improve efficiency without compromising accuracy. In our method, we replaced the heavy backbone and neck of YOLOv8 with HGNetv2 and slim-neck, respectively. We also implemented a lightweight decoupling head using EMSConvP. Additionally, we integrated a knowledge distillation module to further enhance detection capabilities. Furthermore, we conducted extensive experiments on the short-time sequence SAR dataset to demonstrate superior accuracy metrics compared to the original YOLOv8n model. Regarding tracking ships in SAR images, we developed a multi-object tracking (MOT) technique called Cascaded-Buffered IoU (C-BIoU). This method enlarges the detection and trajectory matching space by increasing the buffer zone, effectively combining detection and trajectory information from short-time sequence SAR images. The findings reveal that our method significantly reduces the computational complexity, parameters, and model size by up to 54.7 %, 68.4 %, and 68.3 %, respectively, with respect to the original model metrics. As a direct consequence of these reductions, our proposed model demonstrates a remarkable 133.1 % improvement in image processing speed expressed as frames per second (FPS). Moreover, Our C-BIoU method shows outstanding performance in tracking accuracy and efficiency, with superior Higher Order Tracking Accuracy (HOTA), Multiple Object Tracking Precision (MOTP), and Identification F1 score (IDF1) scores of 72.8 %, 87.9 %, and 80.7 %, respectively, compared to existing tracking algorithms. The results from testing on multiple datasets highlight our method’s excellent performance in ship detection and tracking, offering high-speed processing capabilities with an average image processing speed of 81 FPS. In this sense, this method provides reliable real-time monitoring and management of maritime traffic, enhancing situational awareness for maritime operations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations71
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Applied Earth Observation and GeoinformationSame topicSynthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Applications and TechniquesFrench-language works237,207