MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4402498198 · doi:10.1101/2024.09.11.612527

The transmembrane glycoprotein Gpnmb is required for the immune and fibrotic responses during zebrafish heart regeneration

2024· preprint· en· W4402498198 on OpenAlexaff
Savita Gupta, Gursimran Kaur Bajwa, Hadil El‐Sammak, Kenny Mattonet, Stefan Günther, Mario Looso, Didier Y. R. Stainier, Rubén Marín‐Juez

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2024
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCongenital heart defects research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine
Fundersnot available
KeywordsZebrafishRegeneration (biology)GlycoproteinTransmembrane proteinImmune systemCell biologyMembrane glycoproteinsBiologyMedicineImmunologyInternal medicineMolecular biologyBiochemistryReceptorGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Myocardial infarction occurs when coronary supply of oxygen and nutrients to part of the heart is interrupted. In contrast to adult mammals, adult zebrafish have a unique ability to regenerate their heart after cardiac injury. Several processes are involved in this regenerative response including inflammation, coronary endothelial cell proliferation and revascularization, endocardial expansion, cardiomyocyte repopulation, and transient scar formation. To identify potential regulators of zebrafish cardiac regeneration, we profiled the transcriptome of regenerating coronary endothelial cells at 7 days post cryoinjury (dpci) and observed the significant upregulation of dozens of genes including gpnmb . Gpnmb (glycoprotein non-metastatic melanoma protein B) is a transmembrane glycoprotein implicated in inflammation resolution and tissue regeneration. Transcriptomic profiling data of cryoinjured zebrafish hearts reveal that gpnmb is mostly expressed by macrophages. To investigate gpnmb function during zebrafish cardiac regeneration, we generated a full locus deletion (FLD) allele. We find that after cardiac cryoinjury, animals lacking gpnmb exhibit neutrophil retention and decreased macrophage recruitment as well as reduced myofibroblast numbers. Moreover, loss of gpnmb impairs coronary endothelial cell regeneration and cardiomyocyte dedifferentiation. Transcriptomic analyses of cryoinjured gpnmb mutant hearts identified enhanced collagen gene expression and the activation of extracellular matrix (ECM) related pathways. Furthermore, gpnmb mutant hearts exhibit larger fibrotic scars revealing additional defects in cardiac regeneration. Altogether, these data indicate that gpnmb expressing macrophages modulate inflammation and ECM deposition after cardiac cryoinjury in zebrafish and further highlight the importance of this subset of immune cells to support a regenerative response.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicCongenital heart defects research→French-language works237,207→