MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402501684 · doi:10.11159/newtech24

Proceedings of the 10th World Congress on New Technologies

2024· paratext· en· W4402501684 on OpenAlexvenueno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the World Congress on New Technologies · 2024
Typeparatext
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIntravenous Infusion Technology and Safety
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersTongji University
KeywordsComputer sciencePolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

On behalf of the International Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology (International ASET Inc.), the organizing committee would like to welcome you to the 10th World Congress on New Technologies (NewTech 2024).NewTech is aimed to become one of the leading international annual congresses in the fields of new technologies.This congress will provide excellent opportunities to the scientists, researchers, industrial engineers, and university students to present their research achievements and to develop new collaborations and partnerships with experts in the field.While each conference consists of an individual and separate theme, the 4 conferences share considerable overlap, which prompted the organization of this congress.The goal of this undertaking is to bring together experts in each of the specialized fields, and at the same time allow for cross pollinations and sharing of ideas from the other closely related research areas.In the tenth meeting of this conference, four Plenary Speakers and three keynote speakers will share their expertise with the aim of exposing participants to a wide spectrum of applications, and to foster crosspollination of ideas and develop new research interests.In addition, approximately 106 papers will be presented from professors, students, and researchers across the world.We thank you for your participation and contribution to the 10th World Congress on New Technologies (NewTech 2024).We wish you a very successful and enjoyable experience.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.192
Threshold uncertainty score0.642

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0090.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1920.118

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the World Congress on New TechnologiesSame topicIntravenous Infusion Technology and SafetyFrench-language works237,207