MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402501789 · doi:10.11159/icbb24.122

Development And Validation Of An AI-Based Pathomics Biomarker To Predict Response To First-Line Treatment In Metastatic Colorectal Cancers

2024· article· en· W4402501789 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Giulia Nicoletti, Debora Cafaro, Valentina Giannini, Gianluca Mauri, Caterina Marchiò, Luca Lazzari, Andrea Sartore‐Bianchi, Federica Marmorino, Maria Nieva Munoz, N. Saoudi Gonzalez, Alberto Puccini, Martina Di Como, Maria Costanza Aquilano, Emanuela Bonoldi, Salvatore Siena, Silvia Marsoni, Daniele Regge

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the World Congress on New Technologies · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsColorectal cancerBiomarkerOncologyInternal medicineMedicineComputer scienceCancerBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Microsatellite stable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients are treated with a "one-fits-all" standard of care chemotherapy.However, responses occur in 20-30% of patients, while 15-20% are refractory.The latter are exposed to side effects that lower their quality of life.Therefore, the aim of this work is to develop a predictive biomarker, based on digital pathology images, that can help stratify patients according to their risk of resistance.Hematoxylin and eosin-stained (H&E) slides of mCRC resections were digitalized.Patches were extracted from the resulting whole slide images and automatically classified as belonging to one out of 9 classes, including the tumoral one, using a deep learning model.Based on texture features, clusters of patches were computed and were used to create the Bag of words (BoWs) that were subsequently used to train several machine learning classifiers.The best performances were obtained by a support vector machine, reaching a negative predictive value (NPV) of 90% (44/49; 95%CI=79-95%) and 82% (14/17; ICBB 122-2 95%CI=63-93%), in the training and validation sets, respectively.From a clinical perspective, NPV is the most relevant metric to ensure that sensitive patients are not wrongly prevented from receiving treatment.These preliminary findings should be further validated on a larger cohort of patients that we are collecting through a multi-institutional study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the World Congress on New TechnologiesSame topicRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical ImagingFrench-language works237,207