MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402508517 · doi:10.1109/tnse.2024.3460479

Augmenting Backpressure Scheduling and Routing for Wireless Computing Networks

2024· article· en· W4402508517 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Network Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of WaterlooQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer networkScheduling (production processes)WirelessDistributed computingWireless networkDynamic Source RoutingRouting (electronic design automation)Wireless Routing ProtocolRouting protocolTelecommunicationsMathematical optimizationMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Driven by the ever-increasing computing capabilities of mobile devices, the next-generation wireless networks are evolving towards distributed networking and computing platforms, which enable in-network computing and unified resource/service provisioning. The evolution leads to a growing research interest in wireless computing networks that operate under the high dynamics of the wireless environment, the complexity of heterogeneous resource allocation, scheduling, and overall optimization. In this paper, we propose a low-complexity efficient solution to jointly allocate both networking resources (e.g., links to forward packets between connected computing nodes) and computing resources (e.g., computing power at each node for packet processing) for wireless computing networks. Specifically, we propose a novel network utility maximization problem under computing and networking resource constraints and develop an enhanced backpressure-based dynamic scheduling and routing algorithm. We verify the network stability and near-optimal performance of the algorithm via both theoretical analysis and extensive simulations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.922
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it