Younger epigenetic age is associated with higher cardiorespiratory fitness in individuals with airflow limitation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We hypothesized that increased cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) slows down a person's aging, particularly in individuals with chronic airflow limitation (CAL). Participants aged ≥40 years ( n = 78) had baseline blood DNA methylation profiled and underwent cardiopulmonary cycle exercise testing at baseline and at three years. Epigenetic clocks were calculated and tested for their association with CRF using linear regression. Differentially methylated genes associated with CRF were identified using a robust linear model. Higher CRF at baseline was associated with lower age acceleration in the epigenetic clocks DNAmAgeSkinBlood ( p = 0.016 ), DNAmGrimAge ( p = 0.012 ), and DNAmGrimAge2 ( p = 0.011 ). These effects were consistent in individuals with CAL (DNAmGrimAge p = 0.009 and DNAmGrimAge2 p = 0.007 ). CRF at three years was associated with baseline DNAmGrimAge ( p = 0.015 ) and DNAmGrimAge2 ( p = 0.011 ). Differentially methylated genes associated with CRF enriched multiple aging-related pathways, including cellular senescence. Enhancing CRF may be one intervention that can slow biological aging and improve health outcomes in chronic respiratory diseases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".