Modeling dissolved organic carbon in inland waters using an unmanned aerial vehicles-borne hyperspectral camera
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Remote sensing can provide an alternative solution to quantify Dissolved Organic Carbon (DOC) in inland waters. Sensors embedded on Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAV) and satellites that can capture the DOC have already shown good relationships between DOC and the Colored Dissolved Organic Matter absorption (aCDOM.) coefficients in specific spectral regions. However, since the signal recorded by the sensors is reflectance-based, DOC estimates accuracy decreases when inverting the aCDOM. coefficients to reflectance. Thus, the main objective is to study the potential of a UAV-borne hyperspectral camera to retrieve the DOC in inland waters and to develop reflectance-based models using UAV and satellite (Landsat-8 OLI and Sentinel-2 MSI) data. Ensemble based systems (EBS) were favored in this study. The EBS UAV calibration results showed that six spectral regions (543.5, 564.5, 580.5, 609.5, 660, and 684 nm) are sensitive to DOC in waters. The EBS UAV test results showed a good concordance between measured and estimated DOC with an R 2 = Nash-criterion (NASH) = 0.86, and RMSE (Root Mean Squares Error) = 0.68 mg C/L. The EBS SAT test results also showed a strong concordance between measured and estimated DOC with R 2 = NASH = 0.92 and RMSE = 0.74 mg C/L. The spatial distribution of DOC estimates showed no dependency to other optically active elements. Nevertheless, estimates were sensitive to haze and sun glint. • Dissolved organic carbon (DOC) monitoring using remote sensing data. • Ensemble-based system (EBS) for monitoring DOC using UAV data in inland waters. • EBS for monitoring DOC using Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2 data in inland waters. • The developed EBSs are not sensitive to suspend solid and harmful algae bloom present in the water column. • The developed EBSs are sensitive to cloud and sun-glint.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".