MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402512232 · doi:10.1016/j.mcpro.2024.100840

metaExpertPro: A Computational Workflow for Metaproteomics Spectral Library Construction and Data-Independent Acquisition Mass Spectrometry Data Analysis

2024· article· en· W4402512232 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Yingying Sun, Ziyuan Xing, Shuang Liang, Zelei Miao, Lai‐Bao Zhuo, Wenhao Jiang, Hui Zhao, Huanhuan Gao, Yuting Xie, Yan Zhou, Liang Yue, Xue Cai, Yu‐Ming Chen, Ju‐Sheng Zheng, Tiannan Guo

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular & Cellular Proteomics · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersTurun YliopistoNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaWestlake UniversityUniversity of Ottawa
KeywordsMetaproteomicsWorkflowMass spectrometryComputer scienceData miningComputational biologyInformation retrievalChemistryProteomicsChromatographyDatabaseBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Analysis of large-scale data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry metaproteomics data remains a computational challenge. Here, we present a computational pipeline called metaExpertPro for metaproteomics data analysis. This pipeline encompasses spectral library generation using data-dependent acquisition MS, protein identification and quantification using data-independent acquisition mass spectrometry, functional and taxonomic annotation, as well as quantitative matrix generation for both microbiota and hosts. By integrating FragPipe and DIA-NN, metaExpertPro offers compatibility with both Orbitrap and timsTOF MS instruments. To evaluate the depth and accuracy of identification and quantification, we conducted extensive assessments using human fecal samples and benchmark tests. Performance tests conducted on human fecal samples indicated that metaExpertPro quantified an average of 45,000 peptides in a 60-min diaPASEF injection. Notably, metaExpertPro outperformed three existing software tools by characterizing a higher number of peptides and proteins. Importantly, metaExpertPro maintained a low factual false discovery rate of approximately 5% for protein groups across four benchmark tests. Applying a filter of five peptides per genus, metaExpertPro achieved relatively high accuracy (F-score = 0.67–0.90) in genus diversity and showed a high correlation (r Spearman = 0.73–0.82) between the measured and true genus relative abundance in benchmark tests. Additionally, the quantitative results at the protein, taxonomy, and function levels exhibited high reproducibility and consistency across the commonly adopted public human gut microbial protein databases IGC and UHGP. In a metaproteomic analysis of dyslipidemia patients, metaExpertPro revealed characteristic alterations in microbial functions and potential interactions between the microbiota and the host.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.003
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0050.004
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular & Cellular ProteomicsSame topicAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207