A novel membrane-based absorber for sorption heat transformers: A comparative experimental study of a thin-film absorbent and salt-impregnated adsorbents
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The present study proposes a novel membrane-based sorber bed with stationary solution film for oscillatory sorption heat transformers. A custom-built gravimetric large pressure jump setup is used to experimentally compare the performance of the novel membrane-based sorber bed with a Lithium Bromide/Silica gel solid composite sorbent synthesized using the salt-impregnation method. It is shown that the current membrane-based sorber bed provides up to about four times the specific cooling power and more than twice the cooling power density of solid sorbents, demonstrating the capability of the present sorber bed as a promising alternative to solid sorbents. The specific cooling power, cooling power density, and energy storage density of about 2.8 kW/kg, 470 kW/m 3 , and 269 MJ/m 3 are experimentally obtained, respectively. According to experimental results, it is observed that the film thickness plays a significant role in sorption dynamics, while the effect of membrane mass transfer resistance on sorption dynamics is less than 10%. In addition, the present membrane-based sorber bed is analytically modeled, and the results are validated with present experimental data. The present analytical model is also used to investigate the effects of design parameters on the performance metrics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".