MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402514435 · doi:10.1097/io9.0000000000000078

Revolutionizing hereditary angioedema management: a breakthrough

2024· article· en· W4402514435 on OpenAlexaff
Soumyajit Das, Mahalaqua Nazli Khatib, Godfrey T. Banda, Shilpa Gaidhane, Divya Sharma, Rakesh Sharma, Mithhil Arora, Sarvesh Rustagi, Prakasini Satapathy, Ranjit Sah

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Surgery Open · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCoagulation, Bradykinin, Polyphosphates, and Angioedema
Canadian institutionsImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHereditary angioedemaAngioedemaIntensive care medicineDermatology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is a genetic disorder with the potential for life-threatening consequences, marked by recurring incidents of angioedema1. First recorded in 1882, HAE is identified as an uncommon autosomal dominant disorder characterized by intermittent, spontaneously resolving tissue swelling linked to reduced functional levels of C1 esterase inhibitor (C1-INH)2,3. Marked by repeated, unforeseeable episodes of swelling caused by leaky blood vessels, HAE greatly diminishes the quality of life for affected individuals1,4. Traditional treatment methods, which demand continuous use and raise concerns about effectiveness, have long prompted the search for innovative solutions. The intricate pathophysiology of HAE is primarily driven by a genetic mutation that induces heightened kallikrein synthesis, initiating the liberation of bradykinin, a potent regulator of vascular permeability5. Consequently, these mechanisms precipitate the characteristic vascular swelling episodes associated with HAE, affecting various organs, including the skin, gut, and lungs. Current therapies, spanning plasma kallikrein inhibitors to RNA-silencing methods, necessitate continual, lifelong application5,6. The unpredictable and severe nature of HAE episodes frequently results in a diminished quality of life for those affected. However, a few weeks ago, NTLA-2002 gene therapy, employing the Nobel Prize-winning gene-editing tool CRISPR/Cas9, exhibited encouraging results in a limited clinical trial for HAE, emerging as a beacon of hope in the therapeutic landscape of HAE7. Researchers observed a notable reduction in monthly episodes of swift swelling, typical of angioedemas, following a single dose, with no significant safety issues7,8. Recent advancements in HAE management have been further solidified by the introduction of novel therapies such as berotralstat, approved for routine prevention of HAE attacks9. This orally administered drug targets the plasma kallikrein pathway more specifically, reducing the frequency of HAE episodes without the need for injections, thus offering an improved quality of life for patients. Likewise, according to the latest findings from ongoing research, novel prophylactic treatments like lanadelumab, an injectable monoclonal antibody that selectively inhibits active plasma kallikrein, have been approved10. This therapy has shown substantial efficacy in reducing the attack rate in HAE patients, offering a new ray of hope for those seeking less frequent treatment administrations. NTLA-2002 represents an in vivo gene-editing intervention utilizing CRISPR-Cas9 technology, specifically directed at the kallikrein B1 (KLKB1) gene7. The objective is to achieve sustained management of angioedema episodes throughout one’s life with just a single administration. It employs lipid nanoparticle technology for conveying mRNAs that encode the Cas9 endonuclease and a single guide RNA (sgRNA) to hepatocytes, primarily housing KLKB17. Through deactivating the gene accountable for plasma prekallikrein production, NTLA-2002 aims to offer a singular, enduring resolution HAE. In a meticulously executed Phase I trial conducted at various global locations, NTLA-2002 not only exhibited an impeccable safety record but also displayed noteworthy, dose-dependent decreases in overall plasma kallikrein protein levels7. The reduction in the frequency of angioedema attacks further emphasizes the therapeutic promise inherent in this groundbreaking intervention. Real-world impact echoed through patient testimonials, portraying the transformative effects of the therapy. Participants described the therapy as a ‘medical magic wand’, emphasizing the liberation from the shackles of chronic HAE attacks and the associated physical and mental burdens11. The notable achievements of NTLA-2002 have garnered attention, resulting in its classification as a priority medicine by the European Medicines Agency12. The upcoming pivotal Phase III study on a global scale seeks to further establish its status as a groundbreaking therapy with the potential to redefine the landscape of managing HAE7,8,11. As we move forward, continuous monitoring and long-term follow-up studies are essential to validate the durability and broader applicability of these gene-editing and new pharmacological interventions, ensuring that the promise they hold translates into long-term benefits for patients with HAE. In the pursuit of overcoming HAE, NTLA-2002 emerges as a promising symbol, employing CRISPR-Cas9 to redefine therapeutic strategies. This advancement not only signifies a substantial advancement in meeting the unfulfilled requirements of individuals with HAE but also emphasizes the revolutionary capabilities of gene-editing technologies in the domain of rare genetic disorders. Ethical approval This study does not require ethics approval. Consent Not applicable. Sources of funding This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. Author contribution S.D. and M.N.K.: contributed equally to the conception, design, analysis, and interpretation of data, drafting the manuscript, and critical revision; G.T.B., S.G., D.S., and R.K.S.: contributed to data acquisition, analysis, drafting, and critical revision; M.A., S.R., P.S., and R.S.: contributed to data interpretation, drafting, and critical revision. All authors approved the final version and agreed to be accountable for the work. Conflicts of interest disclosure None. Research registration unique identifying number (UIN) Not Applicable. Guarantor Not Applicable. Data availability statement Not applicable. Provenance and peer review Not Applicable.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.339
Threshold uncertainty score0.918

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.350
Teacher spread0.287 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Surgery OpenSame topicCoagulation, Bradykinin, Polyphosphates, and AngioedemaFrench-language works237,207