MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Impact of Age of Diagnosis in Children with Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia

2024· article· en· W4402516031 on OpenAlexaff
Dvir Gatt, Michelle Shaw, Fiona Kritzinger, Melinda Solomon, Sharon Dell, Félix Ratjen

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnals of the American Thoracic Society · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicDysphagia Assessment and Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaHospital for Sick ChildrenBC Children's HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrimary ciliary dyskinesiaMedicinePediatricsDyskinesiaPrimary (astronomy)Internal medicineBronchiectasisLungDiseaseParkinson's disease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Rationale The typical symptoms of primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) manifest after birth and in early infancy, but diagnosis is often not confirmed during infancy. There is currently a lack of evidence in PCD regarding the impact of the age of the patient at the time of diagnosis on clinical outcomes. Objective To determine whether early diagnosis of PCD is related to improved long-term outcomes. Methods This was a retrospective study of patients diagnosed with PCD between 2000 and 2022. We divided our cohort into three groups according to the age at diagnosis: (1) early diagnosis (age <1 year), typical diagnosis (age 1–7 years), and late diagnosis (age 8–14 years). We compared various clinical long-term outcomes between the groups. Results During the study period, 110 patients were included in the analysis, with 41 patients in the early diagnosis group, 35 in the typical diagnosis group, and 34 in the late diagnosis group. Unexplained neonatal respiratory distress and organ laterality defect were more common in the early diagnosis group, with respective rates in the early, typical, and late diagnosis groups of 80%, 53%, and 61% for neonatal respiratory distress (P = 0.045) and 64%, 50%, and 18% for laterality defect (P < 0.001). At the end of the first decade of life, patients in the early and typical-age diagnosis groups had better forced expiratory volume in 1 second compared with the late diagnosis group (93.5% and 93.1% vs. 80.2%; P = 0.002), but there was no significant change in the annual rate of decline between the groups when diagnosis had been confirmed. Patients diagnosed late had significantly higher rates of pulmonary exacerbations than those diagnosed at a typical age (1.95 vs. 0.75 per year; P < 0.01) Conclusions Late diagnosis (age ≥8 years) was associated with lower forced expiratory volume in 1 second throughout childhood, although, once diagnosed, the annual rate of decline was not different. These findings demonstrate the negative effect of delayed diagnosis in pediatric PCD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score0.355

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.472
Teacher spread0.403 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnals of the American Thoracic SocietySame topicDysphagia Assessment and ManagementFrench-language works237,207