Ultrasound‐Assisted Catalysis: A Pathway to Novel and Selective Chemical Transformations in Condensed Phase
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In this paper, we review the concept of synergistically using ultrasonic sonochemistry in combination with heterogeneous catalysis, to selectively perform condensed phase chemical transformations. Through specific examples, we highlight that ultrasound induced cavitation bubbles not only provide local high temperature and pressure conditions for initiating chemical reactions but also improves heat, mass and charge transfer characteristics in the system. We also show that sonocatalysis can alter reaction mechanisms and open new activation and reaction pathways that are not intuitive to thermocatalysis. Computational chemistry tools are introduced and are combined with sonocatalysis experimental studies to demonstrate that, in‐situ generated radicals propelled into the bulk liquid solution upon bubbles implosion can be stabilized by catalyst surfaces, while creating active sites for unique reactions during heterogeneous sonocatalytic chemistry. We also report recent examples of condensed phase sonocatalysis applications, including pollutant degradation, chemical and pharmaceutical synthesis and biomass upgrading, and provide mechanistic insights into the process.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".