MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402516450 · doi:10.1002/dvr2.70000

Neurodiversity in the workplace: An agenda for research and action

2024· article· en· W4402516450 on OpenAlexaff
Lorne M. Hartman, Braxton L. Hartman

Bibliographic record

VenueDiversity & Inclusion Research · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDisability Education and Employment
Canadian institutionsYork UniversityUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAction (physics)PsychologyCognitive scienceSociologyPolitical sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This paper considers human resource practices in the workplace that represent barriers to hiring, onboarding, and managing autistic employees. In particular, we focus on the development of bias‐free selection processes to minimize discrimination against autistic job candidates, determining whether and how accommodations affect productivity of autistic employees, and changing attitudes toward autistic employees in the workplace. Implications for future research and recommendations for autism awareness training are provided. Finally, the alignment of organizational systems that facilitate successful employment experiences for autistic adults is explored.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.018
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.515
Threshold uncertainty score0.993

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0180.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0090.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.544
GPT teacher head0.570
Teacher spread0.026 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiversity & Inclusion ResearchSame topicDisability Education and EmploymentFrench-language works237,207