MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4402516633 · doi:10.1115/1.4066544

Modeling of Ball Screw–Nut Interface Stiffness With Wear (Ball Screw Wear Dynamics)

2024· article· en· W4402516633 on OpenAlexaff
Hoda Heydarnia, Yusuf Altıntaş

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering · 2024
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGear and Bearing Dynamics Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBall screwBall (mathematics)NutStiffnessMaterials scienceComposite materialMechanical engineeringEngineeringGeometryMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The effects of wear, preload loss, and missing balls on the dynamics of ball screw drives in machine tools are modeled and incorporated into the finite element model of the drive assembly for condition monitoring. The contacts between the ball–nut and ball–screw are modeled using Hertzian springs, whose stiffnesses vary as a function of the worn contact area. These contact stiffnesses are then transformed to the finite element nodes on the nut and screw. The frequency response functions at the motor shaft and table, which can be measured by commercial computer numerical control (CNC), are predicted for various faults at different positions of the table. The experimentally validated model demonstrates that the faults primarily affect the first coupled torsional-axial mode of the ball screw drive and can be utilized for automated condition monitoring of ball screw drives.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2024
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Manufacturing Science and EngineeringSame topicGear and Bearing Dynamics AnalysisFrench-language works237,207